Adona
Pseudonym
for all of the Kosovar children
and their families. |
|
Christopher
Hitchens: SREBRENICA REVISITED
The Nation
April 19, 1999 Christopher Hitchens
for fair use
April 19, 1999
CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS
Srebrenica Revisited
During the Balkan war of 1912, Leon Trotsky was a war
correspondent for a group of liberal Russian and Ukrainian newspapers. He understood that
pan-Slavic and Christian Orthodox chauvinism was a crucial element in Russian
tyranny--just as it is today in the warped worldview of our ally Yeltsin--and he wrote of
the atrocities committed in Kosovo that Russian indulgence made it much easier for Serbian
and Bulgarian gangs "to engage in their Cain's work of further massacres of the
peoples of the Crescent in the interests of the 'culture' of the Cross." Quoting a Serbian soldier whose civil and political conscience had been
revolted, Trotsky reported:
The horrors actually began as soon as we crossed the old
frontier.... The darker the sky became, the more brightly the fearful illumination of the
fires stood out against it. Burning was going on all around us. Entire Albanian villages
had been turned into pillars of fire.... Dwellings, possessions accumulated by fathers,
grandfathers, and great-grandfathers, were going up in flames.
But most Europeans found that they could contemplate the
immolation of obscure Muslims with relative equanimity. As indeed can we. In order to
understand the shame of what has lately occurred (or better say recurred) in Kosovo, one
must revisit the shame of what occurred at Srebrenica.
It is unlikely that even the Serbian "irregulars" in
Kosovo have exceeded what they accomplished in that Bosnian "safe haven" in July
1995: the organized killing and interment of perhaps 10,000 male captives. That hecatomb
was carved out and filled up as US satellites whirled calmly overhead recording the
information, and as NATO troops stood by and exchanged pleasantries with the overworked
executioners.
Even Richard Holbrooke, a man trained to realpolitik in a hard
school, had the grace to look embarrassed and awkward when asked what the United States
knew and when it knew it.
Srebrenica, however, was described by many liberals, and accepted by the Clinton
Administration, as "a blessing in disguise." It so horrified and terrified the
Bosnian leadership that it brought them to the conference in Dayton, Ohio. And so grateful
was Slobodan Milosevic for the forbearance of Washington in understating and even
concealing his role in the mass murder that he consented to come to Dayton also, and to
become the valued co-sponsor of a Pax Americana. From this glorious page of diplomacy it
was but a step to a whole new chapter: a NATO assault on what seems to most Serbs like all
of Serbia, with the ethereal war machines flying high over the continuing pogrom while
soliciting another handshake from--the same Milosevic himself! To get the worst of so many
worlds--if the expression is not itself an insult to so many victims past, present and
future--one has to have a regime that is numb to all questions of history and all matters
of principle.
You can forget all the half-baked nonsense about Kosovo being
Milosevic's "Holy Land" or his Jerusalem. It would be more accurate to call it
his Sudetenland or his Anschluss. In Kosovo, thanks to the Albanian boycott of the rigged
elections, his party gets 20 percent of
its seats. In Kosovo in April 1987, thanks to a quick-change from Balkan Stalinism to
Balkan national socialism, he was able to don the mantle of racial and populist demagogue.
(There is live footage of the clumsy and obvious staging of this provocation.) It would
cost him his head, never mind his job, if he backed down too fast. But, in the cleansing
interval that was both provoked and provided by the threat of air attacks on other parts
of Yugoslavia, he may have won enough ground and displaced enough people to call for
another Dayton, and perhaps to get Yeltsin and Holbrooke to help broker it.
One says "other parts of Yugoslavia" because our heroic
President and Commander in Chief could not have been more wrong, in his patronizing speech
on Day One, than in referring to Kosovo as "a province of Serbia." Internally
speaking, it is a formerly autonomous region of former Yugoslavia. Its constitutional
autonomy was unilaterally revoked by Milosevic when he began his seizure of power and his
demented campaign to redefine Yugoslavia as a Serbian mini-empire. Externally speaking,
the frontier demarcating Kosovo from Albania is recognized, by international treaties,
only as a Yugoslav border. Should Montenegro secede from the rump federation, as
Montenegrin democrats wish, there will be no more "Yugoslavia" for Kosovo to
belong to. It would be nice to believe that there was anyone in Washington who had allowed
for this possibility or pondered its implications. But then, just you try asking whether
Kosovo, in the United States design, is intended to get its autonomy back, or to become a
part of Serbia, or to be subject to an improvised partition, or to become independent, or
to federate with a future "Greater Albania" (which would itself be an ugly
metastasis of the model Greater Serbia). Blank looks are what you get. These people don't
think, and probably can't think, beyond the next news cycle. Which is why another Dayton
may succeed another Srebrenica. The likeliest endgame is obviously a de facto
partition/annexation of a cleansed Kosovo; the precise objective proposed by Milosevic's
then-crony Dobrica Cosic back in 1988.
As humanitarian concern increased--over the question of how well
protected were billion-dollar Stealth machines-- I called Srdja Popovic. As the
chief human rights lawyer and dissident of old Yugoslavia, he has only recently decided to
identify himself as a Serb, and to do so as a
further means of denouncing Milosevic. I wondered if anyone from the Administration had
been in touch with him lately. No, he said, not since 1992. "I told them then that
intervention was required for the sake of Serbia as well as Bosnia and Macedonia and
Croatia and Kosovo. They
hated this idea so much that they never called me again. What they do now is sporadic and
improvised, and I have the feeling that they have not thought it through at all." |